This post doesn’t quite fit into my “Back to the Basics” series, as it isn’t broad enough, but I wanted to comment on it nonetheless. Mustard Seed Associates, where I interned this summer, posted this video the other day:
First, let me make this clear: I am not an anarchist. I think that the government plays a valuable and important role. However, although I disagree with him on that point, I think that he has a lot of important and challenging points to make in this video, and I think it ties into my previous post on poverty as well.
One of the points I made about poverty is that it is intensely personal. As such is the case, it has to be solved in the messiness of personal interactions. So, while I don’t advocate abolishing the government, I think there is absolutely something to be said for living life without relying on it.
The reality of life is that no matter what issue we are addressing, no matter what policy or legislation or social movement we consider, when it really comes down to it, it is dealing with people. And people aren’t straightforward, easy to solve, or all the same. Principles are all well and good until they interact with conflicting stories; strategies are excellent until they actually must be applied to messy situations.
So, I’ve come to believe that I can’t save the world. I can’t really effect apt change unless I actually know the problem and the people it affects. For this reason (among others, which I may mention at another time) I am, in general, a proponent of localization. Because if I really want to change the world, I can’t actually begin by changing the whole world. What I can change, is how I live my life, how I interact with others, and the actions I take to solve the problems in my own local context.


